Oh No, I Kinda Want to Work for Elon

An examination of the man-child who would be king

Image credit: Paul Harris/Getty Images

When the third SpaceX rocket exploded, Elon Musk was edging toward a meltdown. The company was on the brink of failure, his entire net worth had been poured into money-losing ventures like Tesla and SpaceX, and this explosion could have been the thing that made it all come crumbling down. Everyone knew it. The mood at the launch sight was sober, perhaps even depressed. The company could be done.

After a minute-long pause, Elon looked up, a glint in his eye. “Pain is not bad, it’s good,” he said. “It teaches you things. I understand that.” 

Engineers around him nodded their heads. A manic, industrial energy started to build in the room. As usual, he went back to the purpose of why they were there. The mission. “What the hell do I wanna go off and go to work for? Work for what? Money?” They were going to Mars—who cared about the business?

Elon Musk, the new biography by Walter Issacson, reported on what followed:

“‘I think most of us would have followed him into the gates of hell carrying suntan oil after that,” said Dolly Singh, the human resources director. ‘Within moments, the energy of the building went from despair and defeat to a massive buzz of determination.’”  

The next time, they pulled it off, making SpaceX the first privately built rocket to launch from the ground and reach orbit. They had done it with 500 employees, compared to the 50,000 that Boeing had at a similar division. It was the launch that set the company up for the roughly $150B valuation it enjoys today. 

So, a confession. This story is a bit of a lie. 

The rockets did explode. Elon did make a rousing speech. The engineers did come together and build an incredible company. The only difference is that these quotes are not from Elon Musk—they’re from murderous cult leader Charles Manson. Musk actually said, “There should be absolutely zero question that SpaceX will prevail in reaching orbit. I will never give up, and I mean never.”

Learn more

Curious?

Try it: $1 for 2 weeks.
Subscribe →

Or, login.

Read this next:

Napkin Math

The Case Against Sam Altman

The board is bad at their job, but they may not be crazy

2 Nov 21, 2023 by Evan Armstrong

Napkin Math

How to Win Arguments and Manipulate Managers

Make your spreadsheets shape strategy

7 Nov 2, 2023 by Evan Armstrong

Napkin Math

How I Use ChatGPT (As A Reasonable Person)

My AI awakening

8 Nov 30, 2023 by Evan Armstrong

Chain of Thought

Quick Hits: New AI Features From Arc and ChatGPT

The future arrived faster than I expected

2 🔒 Feb 2, 2024 by Dan Shipper

Napkin Math

Profit, Power, and the Vision Pro

Will Apple’s new headset change everything?

5 Feb 6, 2024 by Evan Armstrong

Thanks for rating this post—join the conversation by commenting below.

Comments

You need to login before you can comment.
Don't have an account? Sign up!
Brad Z. 9 months ago

enjoyable to read.

Dan Shipper 9 months ago

@Zeromick glad you liked it brad!

@sarah.c 9 months ago

I have a bit of a problem with the idea that it's his genius that lets him get away with being an asshole. If poor people break the rules and discard social norms the way rich guys like Musk do, we end up unemployed/homeless/imprisoned. It's the wealth and power that allows people to behave in this way, for good or ill, not any kind of special genius.

@alex_3418 9 months ago

At one end of the spectrum, he has made Incredible achievements, I couldn’t do it. At the other end, well at least he is not Charles Manson. That’s a pretty low bar, and why aren’t we digging into that? That’s what’s offering him a lot of leeway to be a childlike maniac. Lebron James has a duty to be a responsible athlete so that kids look up to him and want to be better. Why are we not talking about the utter lack of responsible leadership in tech?

@rberger 9 months ago

@alex_3418 The fact that Musk went all fascist when he could have been one of the greatest examples of what humans could be, as a responsible technologist, is his greatest failing. Unfortunately, I think the Charles Manson comparison is apt. Musk is insane. The only real difference its that he has an insane amount of power.

George Meza 9 months ago

I'm not an "Elon fan" and I do try to use critical thinking. So saying that "There isn’t that much of a difference between the two" Charles Manson, a serial Killer, an Elon Musk, is not only the laziest of analogies, but it demonstrates the kind of ad-hominem argumentation that eliminates the credibility of anybody making the assertion... Nuance is dead even among long-form writers. Sad state of affairs we find ourselves in.

@majid 9 months ago

@JCX That whole setup was lame. Why do writers try so hard to give us emotional tugs and to put smiles on our face. And please, why do we glorify financial success?!

@rberger 9 months ago

I am concerned that Musk is the most dangerous person in the world right now. He has too much power and is too unstable. He has shown that he is a literal fascist and could easily be full Nazi. He needs to be punched.

@deleted_90053 9 months ago

You missed one significant superpower of Musk's - his ability to get other people to pay for his folly. The government, for example. We are all paying for this sociopath's toys. Like that other stable genius, it's all smoke and mirrors, and someday you'll be writing a mea culpa when his house of cards collapse. I look forward to reading that.

Evan Armstrong 9 months ago

@mattlove1 thanks for the reply Matt. You could argue that some of his newer ventures are somehow subsidized by lower interest rates, but Tesla is a profitable car manufacturer valued at hundreds of billions of dollars. I suppose you could argue that the company's use of federal tax credits are wholly responsible for this success? But all his competitors have access to those subsidies too. And keep in mind those policies were put in place by Democrats, not republicans. SpaceX does receive government contracts but they won in a competitive bidding process against JPL—so if this is "folly" then it is at the level of NASA's budgeting policies. Curious if you have a specific instance in mind that I've missed?

Chris Ogunlowo 9 months ago

I’m 40% into the book. This captures most of my impressions about the book and its subject.

jen beaven 9 months ago

He needs to renounce his US citizenship (and government contracts and subsidies) or stop supporting the wrong side in a criminal war against a US ally. Or better yet, he should get his ass to Mars.

Every smart person you know is reading this newsletter

Get one actionable essay a day on AI, tech, and personal development

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Login