Just-In-Time PM #8: Divergence and Convergence

In Part 7, I argued for the importance of interacting with information, instead of just passively consuming it. Interaction results in better learning at the same time as it creates valuable deliverables.

But incorporating all these new ideas about how work is completed – flow cycles and intermediate packets, downscoping and evolving deliverables, interaction over consumption – can be a little overwhelming. You may be wondering, “how do I know which of these techniques I should be doing at any given time?”

There is a very simple model drawn from Design Thinking that is helpful when thinking about abstract work. It is called divergence and convergence.

The basic idea is that all creative work is completed in one of these two modes, which alternate back and forth:

Learn more

This post is for
paying subscribers

Subscribe →

Or, login.

Read this next:

Praxis

PARA on Paper

How I adapted the PARA process and transformed my knowledge management

52 🔒 Jan 7, 2022 by Christina Luo

Praxis

The PARA Method: A Universal System for Organizing Digital Information

Imagine for a moment the perfect organizational system.

13 🔒 Feb 9, 2017 by Tiago Forte

Praxis

The 4 Identities of a Teacher

Reporter, Expert, Mentor, Role Model

22 Jan 19, 2022 by Tiago Forte

Praxis

Just-In-Time PM #13: Component Thinking

In Part 12, I described the shift from a just-in-case to a just-in-time philosophy of work, using late starts as an example of the benefits

1 🔒 May 31, 2018 by Tiago Forte

Praxis

Just-In-Time PM #3: Flow Cycles

In Part 2, I described the sublime and powerful experience of flow, which could be considered the “holy grail” of productivity. I argued tha

3 🔒 May 19, 2018 by Tiago Forte

Thanks for reading Every!

Sign up for our daily email featuring the most interesting thinking (and thinkers) in tech.

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Login