Why Vice is Building an OnlyFans Community

Welcome to Issue #14 of the Means of Creation weekly news roundup where we break down the latest news on the passion economy, including the happenings related to platforms, creators, startups, and trends.

Happy New Year!

Happy new year everyone! After a couple weeks off, we’re excited to share the first issue of 2021!

As for the Means of Creation Show — you can revisit previous episodes on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Overcast, Breaker or wherever you listen to podcasts, or in video format on the Means of Creation YouTube Channel. Past guests include Chris Messina, Nadia Eghbal, Courtland Allen, Eugene Wei, and many others.

Vice Media is Building an OnlyFans Community

What Happened?

Vice Media is building an OnlyFans community around it’s food vertical Munchies. Subscribers will get access to exclusive ‘homemade food related content’ including recipes and behind-the-scenes footage.
Vice, which primarily runs on an ad-supported business model, has priced memberships to the community at $4.99 a month.

👧 Li’s Take:

It seems like Vice is using OnlyFans as a more video-centric alternative to Substack, to create a subscription offering for premium content.
The article cites interesting reasoning: “After exploring the platform and talking to other creators, we found that the opportunity to connect with fans on a more intimate level that comes with an OnlyFans page aligned with how we see our engagement strategy evolving.”
Fostering and monetizing a more intimate connection with fans is something many OnlyFans creators echo as a driver for the success of the platform—OnlyFans offers a private DM feature and enables creators to monetize certain messages. The ethos behind this is, in a way, antithetical to being a mass-media company. I’ll be interested to see how Vice plans to leverage private messages with subscribers.

👦 Nathan’s Take

For Vice, I think this partnership is more of a marketing stunt rather than a potential significant source of revenue since it doesn’t fit their ad-centric business model. They are really just an ad agency for brands targeting an edgier, younger demographic.
For OnlyFans, it helps them accomplish their goal of building out more verticals besides adult content. Vice is a big brand that will invest resources into expanding content types on OnlyFans.
If you think about it, OnlyFans is using Vice to portray legitimacy, while Vice is using only-fans to portray edginess and seem progressive. It’s closer to a brand partnership than acting as a source of revenue.

Twitter Acquires Breaker

What Happened?

Yesterday, Twitter announced its acquisition of podcasting platform Breaker for an undisclosed amount.
The Breaker team will be retained to help build Twitter’s audio-based social networking product ‘Twitter Spaces’.

👧 Li’s Take:

OMG! Firstly, Breaker is shutting down on 1/15 - this is quite devastating. I’ve written quite a bit about podcast discovery before, including factors that make it challenging. Podcasts contain a lot of information that’s all locked in a single, long episode, and users have to invest a ton of time listening to them (often only to find that they didn’t get much out of it). Approaches toward better podcast discovery have been aimed at sharing short snippets, doing in-episode search, and—for Breaker and others—leveraging social signals (i.e. what friends are listening to). I’m not entirely sure what the right approach is, but the shutdown of Breaker means one less player in the podcast discovery space.
On Twitter Spaces, it’ll be interesting to see if audio discovery will be a component of what the Breaker team works on. Given that there’s 300m+ Twitter users, vs. Clubhouse’s 600K, broader rollout of Spaces means there’s going to be a proliferation of audio rooms that can quickly be overwhelming and challenging to navigate.

👦 Nathan’s Take

Before Breaker launched, I got excited about a social podcast app where we could see an algorithmically sorted feed of what friends and influential people are listening to. I even wrote a post about it. After I published it, I got a DM from my friend Erik who said he wanted to work on this. I later became one of the beta users of Breaker and have been a huge fan ever since.
I’m sad to see the product go, but I’m happy that they got an exit and will be working on something that will reach a ton of people at Twitter.
It's an interesting puzzle why this app didn’t take off more. A lot of people really loved it and they were truly pursuing something unique in the space, which is rare. It’s just really hard to build a podcast app, and it’s really hard to build social discovery, and it’s even harder to do those things at the same time.
Maybe my assumptions (in my post) about how valuable discovery could be based on what your friends are listening to may have been off. If we look at other content types, like video, social features haven’t really been added. Everyone has a Netflix account -- they could probably add social features if they wanted. But it’s just hard.
This one is worth puzzling over more.

Clubhouse Launches a Creator Pilot Program

What Happened?

Clubhouse is testing an invite-only “Creator Pilot Program” for its top 40 creators. The promised benefits include regular meetings with the founders and early access to special tools made for power users.
The platform, centered around pop-up audio chat rooms, has 600,000 registered users and is valued at $100 million after a funding round led by Andreessen Horowitz in May.

👧 Li’s Take:

I love seeing Clubhouse (and any platform) prioritizing and recognizing creators. It’s happening early on in its lifecycle, too: Clubhouse only launched earlier in 2020, and the fact that its Creator Pilot Program is already underway suggests a growing recognition in the broader tech ecosystem that on any UGC platform, creators are the originators of the value that draws users and keeps them engaged. If creators are happy on the platform, the audience members will join too. Contrast Clubhouse’s approach vs. the fate of Vine, wherein the company and its creators failed to reach an agreement on features & compensation in fall 2015, leading to the exodus of creators and the demise of the platform.
It’s also interesting to see this in the broader evolution of Clubhouse: in the early days, there wasn’t a distinction between ‘creators’ and ‘audience’ on the app because basically everyone talked! But over time, as the platform scaled, there’s definitely been the emergence of regular creators/hosts that others tuned into frequently (usually on mute), and these creators have started requesting specialized tools to help them create content & compensation.
Putting my creator hat on, I question Clubhouse’s efficacy for building one’s creator brand: given the platform is ephemeral, every time you broadcast, you effectively start from scratch. There’s no asset you’re building (besides followers on the platform) that compound and grow and can be shared over time.

👦 Nathan’s Take

I agree with Li. Clubhouse’s strategy indicates a bigger shift where social networks connecting users have become two sided marketplaces between creators and their audience.

Read full News Roundup

When you subscribe to Means of Creation, you also get:

The Means of Creation talk show every Friday at 11:00am PST / 2:00pm EST featuring founders and investors in the passion economy. Recent guests include Nadia Eghbal, Eugene Wei, and Courtland Allen.
Passion Economy News (you’re reading it now!) where we break down the latest news on the passion economy — platforms, creators, startups, and trends.
Everything else in the bundle, including great stuff from all our other paid newsletters: Divinations, Superorganizers, Praxis, Napkin Math, Ask Jerry, The Long Conversation, Free Radicals, and Almanack. And we’re adding new stuff all the time!