What is “Intrinsic” Value?

And does it matter?

Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JP Morgan Chase, recently said a thing about Bitcoin that was not particularly original: “It's got no intrinsic value!” 

(It made the news anyway because he is Jamie Dimon.)

Of course the Bitcoiners thought this was dumb and the no-coiners thought it was obvious, but I'm interested in what he said because it raises a question that is philosophically intriguing to me:

What is “intrinsic” value?

When people talk about intrinsic value, I think they usually mean something like, ‘what an item is truly worth, regardless of what other people believe.’ They use the word “intrinsic” to highlight the fundamental disconnect between price and value: price is what you pay, value is what you get. I can pick an apple off a tree and try to sell it to you for $100, but physically it’s no different from all the other apples—equally tasty and nutritious. People’s opinions about value can ebb and flow, but the intrinsic value of the apple (calories, vitamins, flavor, etc) is totally disconnected from people’s opinions. It’s intrinsic to the apple.

At least, that’s what I think Jamie Dimon means by it. But, frankly, why is it important? Who cares if I can’t eat a bitcoin? If I buy one and the market price goes up, perhaps it still doesn’t have any intrinsic value, but I can still sell it for a profit and use that money to eat. Just because the value isn’t intrinsic doesn’t mean it’s not real. 

How about THAT, Mr. Dimon?

In an imaginary oak-paneled conference room, Dimon tells me, “Ok, ok. Yes, your bitcoin would be more valuable if the price goes up. The real question is: how certain are you that the price will go up? If you’re going to invest a lot of your net worth in it, you’d better be pretty damned certain. But with assets that have no intrinsic value, you can’t be. This is why intrinsic value matters.”

He fiddles with his cufflink and continues.

Learn more

This post is for
paying subscribers

Subscribe →

Or, login.

Read this next:

Divinations

Instagram can’t recreate TikTok’s Magic

The content format is a red herring. What really matters is the structure and purpose of TikTok’s network, which is antithetical to Instagram.

165 Aug 24, 2020 by Nathan Baschez

Divinations

Roam’s road ahead

How the tool for networked thought can grow into its $200m valuation

217 🔒 Sep 18, 2020 by Nathan Baschez

Divinations

Finding Power

An introduction to Clay Christensen’s most underrated idea: “The Conservation of Modularity”

100 🔒 May 4, 2020 by Nathan Baschez

Superorganizers

The Neuroscience of Achieving Your Goals

We turned a Huberman Lab Podcast Episode into an essay

57 May 14, 2022 by Lewis Kallow

Means of Creation

A Theory of Justice for Web3

Web3 Is Our Chance to Make a Better Internet

20 May 17, 2022 by Li Jin and Katie Parrott

Thanks for reading Every!

Sign up for our daily email featuring the most interesting thinking (and thinkers) in tech.

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Login