Skip to content
Model Wars
Midjourney/Every illustration.

Model Wars

Plus, the AI tell that’s exploded in company documents, a skill for creating product videos, and comics

Apr 24, 2026 · 6 min readUpdated Aug 11, 2026

Comments

GPT 5.5 is here, and OpenAI’s latest model has it all. It’s fast enough to use constantly, personable enough to collaborate with, and assertive enough to carry a plan through serious engineering work. If you didn’t catch our full review, including benchmark results, Reach Test ratings, pricing, screenshots, and advice on when to reach for GPT-5.5 versus Opus 4.7, read our Vibe Check or rewatch the livestream, where we grilled OpenAI’s Dominik Kundel and Romain Huet on how they’re using the model.

But how will that shift the balance between OpenAI and Anthropic? That may be a product question as much as a model question. Every engineer Nityesh Agarwal and Monologue general manager Naveen Naidu weigh in.—Kate Lee


Inside Every

Codex versus Claude Code

This week, Anthropic tested removing Claude Code from the $20 Claude Pro plan, prompting an outcry from users and drawing jabs from OpenAI executives on X, perhaps feeling emboldened by the big launch they knew was coming.

The exchange kicked off a Slack debate between Nityesh Agarwal, our resident Claude Code devotee, and Naveen Naidu, who rides hard for OpenAI’s coding app Codex.

Nityesh’s take: Anthropic potentially raising prices is “simple market economics”—there is a huge demand for Claude products because they’re the best available, so they can charge more. On the other hand, OpenAI’s response underscores how frustrated the company has become playing catch-up as it scrambles to replicate Claude Code, Cowork, and skills. From a product standpoint, Claude in the browser and the Claude Code command line interface (CLI) are better than ChatGPT and Codex.

Naveen’s response: Anthropic’s models are powerful, but they also burn through way too much compute in production. OpenAI is much stronger on infrastructure, and GPT 5.5 is a token-efficient model. And while it’s true Anthropic is first to market with a lot of products and features, including computer use—which allows AI to operate your computer on your behalf—OpenAI is better at execution. Naveen consistently reaches for ChatGPT and the Codex desktop app, while he finds the Claude Code app too buggy to spend any time in.

Where they agree: The Claude Code app is, indeed, bad—Nityesh concedes he only uses the CLI. And both labs misjudged how much compute they would need, but in opposite directions: Anthropic is struggling to keep up with demand, whereas OpenAI has invested heavily in infrastructure and is now scrambling to get people to use its products.


Data point

It’s not just a grammatical pattern; it’s an AI tell

Four times.

That’s how much the usage of...


Become a paid subscriber to Every to unlock this piece and learn about:

  1. The AI tell that’s exploded in corporate documents
  2. How Every’s head of growth makes product videos with Remotion and Claude Code
  3. Why prompts are the new installers
Create a free account to continue reading

The Only Subscription
You Need to Stay at the
Edge of AI

The essential toolkit for those shaping the future

"This might be the best value you
can get from an AI subscription."

- Jay S.

Every ContentEvery Content
AI&I PodcastAI&I Podcast
MonologueMonologue
Every AgentEvery Agent

Join 100,000+ leaders, builders, and innovators

Community members

Already have an account? Sign in.

What is included in a subscription?

Daily insights from AI pioneers + early access to powerful AI tools

PencilFront-row access to the future of AI
CheckIn-depth reviews of new models on release day
CheckPlaybooks and guides for putting AI to work
CheckPrompts and use cases for builders

Related Essays

Comments

You need to login before you can comment. Don't have an account? Sign up!

We use analytics and advertising tools by default. You can update this anytime.