
Writing as a Way of Thinking
Why managers might offer our best clue about AI’s impact on writing
Nov 1, 2024 · 6 min readUpdated Jun 26, 2026
Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up to get it in your inbox.
I always love an article that confirms my priors, so I was particularly excited to read Paul Graham’s latest essay, "Writes and Write-Nots."In case you missed the piece, he argues that writing is an extension of thinking. He believes that as a skill, writing well is already very unequally distributed. And in a world with AI, where your writing is instantly up-leveled by bots like ChatGPT, even fewer people will need to learn to write well. Therefore, even fewer people will think well—dividing the world between writers and write-nots and, as a consequence, between thinkers and think-nots.
This piece pinpoints one of the things I love so much about writing: It is a way of thinking for me. But I don’t share his worries about writing or thinking. Here’s my attempt to articulate why.
Become a paid subscriber to Every to unlock this piece and learn about:
- The false equivalence of writing and thinking
- AI as an augmentation tool rather than replacement
- The persistence of deep thinking in management
- Writing's evolution as a thinking tool
Create a free account, or log in.
Every members live and work at the edge of AI. Join now.
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Sale, Terms of Service, and Privacy Policy.
Enjoy unlimited access to all of Every.
See subscription options